The Properties of Endocal 10 and Its Potential Impact on the Structural Integrity of the Root
Journal of Endodontics, ISSN: 0099-2399, Vol: 30, Issue: 3, Page: 159-162
2004
- 8Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef4
- Captures37
- Readers37
- 37
Article Description
The purpose of this research was to determine if the use of Endocal 10 (previously called Biocalex 6.9) is associated with root fracture and to assess its sealability. Thirty-six freshly extracted, single canal human mandibular incisors were instrumented and randomly divided into two equal groups ( n = 15). Canals in group A were obturated with vertically compacted gutta-percha and Sealapex, and those in group B were filled with Endocal 10 placed with a #25 Lentulo spiral per manufacturer’s instructions. Two blinded investigators evaluated the teeth for fractures using transillumination and an operating microscope at 12× magnification. Three of the fifteen samples filled with Endocal 10 had vertically fractured in half, whereas none of the teeth filled with gutta-percha had any evident fracture lines. The remaining teeth were tested for leakage via a fluid filtration model at 1 wk and 30 days postobturation. No leakage was found among any of the samples whether filled with gutta-percha or with Endocal 10 at either time interval. Statistical analyses were completed using Fisher’s exact test (p = 0.023), which showed that there was a significant increase in chance of fracture when using Endocal 10 versus gutta-percha. The results indicate that, although Endocal 10 is able to seal the tooth as well as gutta-percha and sealer, there is a significant potential risk of root fracture.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099239905603111; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200403000-00008; http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=2342469950&origin=inward; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15055434; http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0099239905603111; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200403000-00008
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know