High-power KTP laser prostatectomy: The new challenge to transurethral resection of the prostate
Current Opinion in Urology, ISSN: 0963-0643, Vol: 14, Issue: 1, Page: 21-25
2004
- 48Citations
- 27Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations48
- Citation Indexes46
- 46
- CrossRef41
- Policy Citations2
- 2
- Captures27
- Readers27
- 27
Review Description
Purpose of review: The quest for a successful surgical modality that can be used in the day-case setting, with minimal risk of complications and without the need for postoperative catheter drainage, may finally be fulfilled in the form of the new-generation, high-power potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) lasers. In this review we will trace the development of KTP laser technology and its use by urologists over the years and describe why its physical properties make it so different from the lasers of the past. Recent findings: The most high powered (80 W) incarnation has a relatively short history, particularly in terms of peer-reviewed publications. We will, however, outline the data so far and demonstrate what an exciting tool this represents for the urologist not only in terms of qualitative and quantitative improvements in lower urinary tract symptoms, but also in offering a day case, and in some instances catheterless, procedure with the prospect of a significantly lower impact on sexual function compared with standard surgical options. Summary: Despite the lack of long-term data it is certainly possible that high-power KTP lasers represent a very significant challenge to the 'gold standard' status of transurethral resection of the prostate. Furthermore, the ability to use this technology to safely and effectively treat very large prostates represents an opportunity to assign the associated morbidity of the open prostatectomy to the annals of history. © 2004 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=2342471283&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00042307-200401000-00005; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15091045; http://journals.lww.com/00042307-200401000-00005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00042307-200401000-00005; https://journals.lww.com/co-urology/Abstract/2004/01000/High_power_KTP_laser_prostatectomy__the_new.5.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know