The application of microarray technology to neuropathology: Cutting edge tool with clinical diagnostics potential or too much information?
Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology, ISSN: 0022-3069, Vol: 65, Issue: 11, Page: 1031-1039
2006
- 8Citations
- 16Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations8
- Citation Indexes8
- CrossRef7
- Captures16
- Readers16
- 15
Review Description
Microarray technology is a tremendously powerful method for simultaneously monitoring the expression of thousands of species of nucleic acids, usually cellular mRNA, producing a high-resolution representation of the genes encoded or expressed in a cell. As such, microarray technology has great potential for impacting research and clinical approaches to treatment. However, this complex technology has been challenging to apply as a result of difficulties discerning biologic variation from technologic issues, therefore slowing the application of the technology to human diagnostics. Nevertheless, significant advances in microarray technology, improvements that avoid potential pitfalls, and a wider spectrum of application are making this technology easier to apply. Indeed, microarray technology has provided valuable insights into mechanisms involving gene regulation and expression in Alzheimer disease, and it remains a powerful tool to identify biomarkers for disease diagnosis. Ultimately, the most robust markers will enable the application of more specific treatments particular to disease stages or subcategories. Currently, no widely applicable molecular test is available to identify those at risk for developing Alzheimer disease or those who have early markers of pathology but show discernible cognitive impairment. The progression of this technology will lead to earlier detection of the disease through enhanced understanding of disease onset and progression. © 2006 American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33750599514&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.jnen.0000240471.04920.3c; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17086099; https://academic.oup.com/jnen/article-lookup/doi/10.1097/01.jnen.0000240471.04920.3c; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.jnen.0000240471.04920.3c; https://academic.oup.com/jnen/article-abstract/65/11/1031/2646701?redirectedFrom=fulltext
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know