Impact of electronic laboratory reporting on hepatitis a surveillance in New York city
Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, ISSN: 1078-4659, Vol: 14, Issue: 5, Page: 437-441
2008
- 14Citations
- 25Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef12
- Policy Citations1
- 1
- Captures25
- Readers25
- 25
Article Description
Background: The New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) coordinates the administration of timely postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) to contacts of hepatitis A cases, making prompt disease reporting especially valuable. Electronic laboratory reporting (ELR) has been shown to improve timeliness of infectious disease reporting, and DOHMH began receiving hepatitis A reports via ELR in 2002. Objectives: (1) to quantify the increase in the proportion of hepatitis A reports received electronically, (2) to assess how implementation of ELR affected the reporting time of hepatitis A, and (3) to assess how changes in reporting time impacted the ability to offer timely prophylaxis to contacts. Methods: We evaluated the proportion of reports received via ELR and the annual reporting time of all hepatitis A reports and quantified the individuals who received PEP from 2000 to 2006. The specific impact of ELR on laboratory reporting time was assessed for nine laboratories certified as of July 2006. ResultS: The proportion of hepatitis A reports received via ELR increased during the study period to 35 percent in 2006. Electronic laboratory reporting improved the reporting time for most of the laboratories certified to report electronically, with a median decrease of 17 days. In 2006, DOHMH administered PEP to 299 individuals; a fourfold increase from 2000. Conclusions: Electronic laboratory reporting provides timely disease data to health departments. Increased utilization of ELR can have a remarkable impact on public health surveillance and response. Copyright © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=56149106190&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.phh.0000333877.78443.f0; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18708886; https://journals.lww.com/00124784-200809000-00005; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00124784-200809000-00005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.phh.0000333877.78443.f0; https://journals.lww.com/jphmp/Abstract/2008/09000/Impact_of_Electronic_Laboratory_Reporting_on.5.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know