Engineering a composite neotrachea in a rat model
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, ISSN: 0032-1052, Vol: 117, Issue: 1, Page: 123-128
2006
- 19Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef16
- Captures11
- Readers11
- 11
Article Description
BACKGROUND: Attempts to reconstruct the trachea have been largely unsuccessful because of its rigidity and opening to the outside environment. Materials that impart rigidity are usually alloplastic, so they cannot be exposed to the open environment without an unacceptably high risk of infection and rejection. The authors hypothesized that tissue engineering principles can be employed to construct a well-integrated neotrachea with rigid support and an epithelial lining to mimic the structure and function of the native trachea. METHODS: A 30-mm-long segment of polytetrafluoroethylene vascular graft with a diameter of 10 mm was lined with a fascial flap based on the superficial inferior epigastric artery with full-thickness skin grafts on its luminal surface. The composite unit was then buried under the abdominal skin of 20 rats and harvested 3 weeks later. Microfil and methylene blue dye were injected into the superficial inferior epigastric arteries and histologic analyses were performed to assess microcirculation and polytetrafluoroethylene-tissue integration. RESULTS: Two composite neotracheas experienced minor damage due to chewing by the rats, but all other neotracheas were viable and without infection. Injection studies demonstrated excellent circulation throughout the fascial flaps and skin grafts and across the polytetrafluoroethylene grafts to the overlying abdominal skin. Histologic analyses revealed abundant muscle-walled blood vessel ingrowth within the polytetrafluoroethylene grafts and all layers of the neotracheas with minimal inflammatory reactions. CONCLUSION: The authors successfully have engineered a well-integrated neotrachea in rats that possesses rigid support, an epithelial lining, and reliable coverage-the prerequisites for successful trachea reconstruction. Copyright ©2005 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33644864628&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000185607.96476.44; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16404258; http://journals.lww.com/00006534-200601000-00019; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00006534-200601000-00019; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=hvTPwbMMYQ1fnT9vnJnbFXp5qlVZ3W4SLjzYBpJL0n8Gh62DMpnJ!351820506!181195628!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00006534-200601000-00019
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know