Lung imaging for titration of mechanical ventilation
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, ISSN: 0952-7907, Vol: 25, Issue: 2, Page: 131-140
2012
- 36Citations
- 98Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations36
- Citation Indexes36
- 36
- CrossRef21
- Captures98
- Readers98
- 98
Review Description
Purpose of review : Computed tomography (CT) has fostered pivotal advancements in the understanding of acute lung injury/ acute respiratory distress syndrome and ventilator-induced lung injury. Apart from CT-based studies, the past years have seen fascinating work using positron emission tomography, electrical impedance tomography and lung ultrasound as diagnostic tools to optimize mechanical ventilation. This review aims to present the major findings of recent studies on lung imaging. Recent findings : Patients presenting with a focal loss of aeration on CT may not be suitable candidates for recruitment maneuvers and high levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in supine position. PET/CT has provided valuable insights into the inflammatory response of the lung. Electrical impedance tomography has been used to assess lung recruitability and to titrate PEEP. Finally, lung ultrasound has proven to be reliable diagnostic tool for assessing PEEP-induced recruitment. Summary : Whereas quantitative CT remains the gold standard to assess lung morphology, recruitment and hyperinflation of lung tissue at different inflation pressures, EIT and LUS have emerged as valuable, radiation-free, noninvasive bedside lung imaging tools that should be used together with global parameters like lung mechanics and gas exchange to acquire additional information on recruitability and ventilation distribution. © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84859748859&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aco.0b013e32835003fb; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22395440; https://journals.lww.com/00001503-201204000-00004; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00001503-201204000-00004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aco.0b013e32835003fb; https://journals.lww.com/co-anesthesiology/Abstract/2012/04000/Lung_imaging_for_titration_of_mechanical.4.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know