New clinical analysis and device for botox injections
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, ISSN: 1536-3732, Vol: 27, Issue: 6, Page: 1554-1557
2016
- 11Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations11
- Citation Indexes11
- 11
- CrossRef4
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
Background: Clinical botulinum toxin (BT) injections are done into recognized anatomical sites with no precise reference lines to make records of our treatments and to plan and position the toxin. Botulinum toxin injections are also characterized for different level of pain on different sites of injection. Objective: The aim of this study is to provide a treatment guide to improve precision and make records, and to evaluate the different levels of pain during the injection. Methods: The same surgeon injected BT into 2 groups of patients; in 25, the authors applied the grid, and in 25 patients the authors did not apply the grid. In the first group of patients, the authors used the new device (Juvapen); for the injection in the second group, the authors performed the injection by the standard procedure. At the end of each procedure, the authors evaluated the level of pain by visual method. Results: Results included 97% degree of symmetry and a 100% patient satisfaction. The mean level of pain in the first group of patient was 3, and in the second group it was 8. Limitations: The authors will apply the grid with the device on a wider population of patients. Conclusions: Facial BT grid analysis lines allow an individualized treatment improving the long-term results. Juvapen permits a less painful injection.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84981736570&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000002758; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27526233; https://journals.lww.com/00001665-201609000-00040; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00001665-201609000-00040; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000002758; https://journals.lww.com/jcraniofacialsurgery/Abstract/2016/09000/New_Clinical_Analysis_and_Device_for_Botox.40.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know