Anesthesia in the patient for awake craniotomy
Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology, ISSN: 0952-7907, Vol: 20, Issue: 4, Page: 331-335
2007
- 70Citations
- 108Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations70
- Citation Indexes70
- 70
- CrossRef49
- Captures108
- Readers108
- 108
Review Description
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current anesthetic management of patients undergoing craniotomies in the awake state. RECENT FINDINGS: As the practice of neurosurgery has moved towards less invasive procedures the need for prolonged, deep general anesthesia has decreased. Since brain mapping and neurophysiologic testing is an integral part of many neurosurgical techniques, the need to provide sufficient analgesia and sedation without interference with electrophysiologic monitoring is also essential. SUMMARY: A safe and acceptable analgesic/amnestic state for these procedures can be provided by the use of dexmedetomidine, with or without the addition of remifentanil. © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=34447337752&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aco.0b013e328136c56f; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17620841; https://journals.lww.com/00001503-200708000-00010; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00001503-200708000-00010; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aco.0b013e328136c56f; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00001503-200708000-00010
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know