Antenatal testing-a reevaluation: Executive summary of a Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development wrkshop
Obstetrics and Gynecology, ISSN: 0029-7844, Vol: 113, Issue: 3, Page: 687-701
2009
- 62Citations
- 89Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations62
- Citation Indexes61
- 61
- CrossRef49
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Captures89
- Readers89
- 69
- 20
Article Description
In August 2007, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the National Institutes of Health Office of Rare Diseases, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the American Academy of Pediatrics cosponsored a 2-day workshop to reassess the body of evidence supporting antepartum assessment of fetal well-being, identify key gaps in the evidence, and formulate recommendations for further research. Participants included experts in obstetrics and fetal physiology and representatives from relevant stakeholder groups and organizations. This article is a summary of the discussions at the workshop, including synopses of oral presentations on the epidemiology of stillbirth and fetal neurological injury, fetal physiology, techniques for antenatal monitoring, and maternal and fetal indications for monitoring. Finally, a synthesis of recommendations for further research compiled from three breakout workgroups is presented. © 2009 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=64249083701&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e318197bd8a; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19300336; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00006250-200903000-00019; https://journals.lww.com/00006250-200903000-00019; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e318197bd8a; https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Abstract/2009/03000/Antenatal_Testing_A_Reevaluation__Executive.19.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know