Biological Response Dynamics to Cochlear Implantation: Modeling and Modulating the Electrode-Tissue Interface
Ear and Hearing, ISSN: 1538-4667, Vol: 43, Issue: 6, Page: 1687-1697
2022
- 1Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
Objective: The present study primarily aims to study and model the impedance dynamics following cochlear implant (CI) surgery in humans. Secondarily, to observe how the modulation of a single-dose topic dexamethasone alters this response. Design: CI impedance and impedance subcomponents were measured in a day-by-day basis between CI surgery and its activation (∼ 1 month). Impedance dynamics were mathematically modeled. Furthermore, we conducted a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effect of dexamethasone application. Results: The model showed good fitting for all impedance's measures and both modulations over time. The clinical impedance and impedance subcomponents showed different patterns between groups during the first week postimplantation. Single-dose topical dexamethasone had a transient effect on Impedances, postponing (for ∼ 3 days) but not preventing the rise in impedance and its application was mainly effective at the base of the cochlea. Conclusions: The proposed mathematical fitting properly resembles the impedance dynamics in humans and their modulation due to the dexamethasone. The impedance subcomponents' dynamic pattern showed a time-course consistent with the biological processes of the foreign body reaction. Single-dose topic dexamethasone has a temporal reduction effect in impedance values on the basal turn of the cochlea but does not prevent the rise on the long-term.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85140416194&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001236; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35666545; https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/AUD.0000000000001236; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001236; https://journals.lww.com/ear-hearing/abstract/2022/11000/biological_response_dynamics_to_cochlear.9.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know