Debridement of cancellous bone: A comparison of irrigation methods
Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, ISSN: 0890-5339, Vol: 20, Issue: 10, Page: 692-698
2006
- 17Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- 17
- CrossRef14
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
Article Description
OBJECTIVE: This study tests the bone debridement efficacy and damage to cancellous bone produced by different wound irrigation methods. METHODS: Cancellous bone slices of bovine distal femurs (3 cm × 3 cm) were divided into eight test groups and scored with a saw in a latticed pattern. Four test groups were contaminated with 1.0 g rock dust and four were not. The specimens were then treated as follows: no treatment (control), bulb irrigation, brush-suction irrigation, or high-pressure pulsatile lavage (HPPL). Runoff from the irrigation was collected, filtered, lyophilized, and ashed to allow for quantitative determination of organic and inorganic material removed from the bone by each irrigation method. The bone samples were subjected to blinded grading on two five-point scales to assess: 1) macroscopic tissue damage and 2) amount of contaminant remaining following treatment. RESULTS: Significantly more (P ≤ 0.05) mean organic material was removed from samples treated with HPPL (744.8 ± 120.0 mg) than with bulb syringe (115.2 ± 11.9 mg) or brush-suction irrigation (95.1 ± 9.2 mg). Brush-suction irrigation removed statistically significantly more (P ≤ 0.05) of the 1.0 g of initial inorganic contaminant (937.7 ± 6.3 mg) than bulb syringe irrigation (866.2 ± 30.1 mg), while HPPL (900.2 ± 19.0 mg) did not. CONCLUSIONS: Past studies have shown HPPL to damage both soft tissue and bone structure. The tissue damage that HPPL produces has been accepted in the past in exchange for its presumed superiority in contaminant removal. In this study, HPPL damaged samples more than other irrigation methods by removing significantly more organic material from them. However, HPPL and bulb syringe removed a statistically similar amount of inorganic contaminant, while brush-suction irrigation removed a significantly greater amount of inorganic contaminant than bulb syringe. It is proposed that HPPL may drive some contaminants deeper into the tissue rather than removing them, rendering HPPL not only more deleterious to bone structure and healing, but also less efficacious at removing contaminant than brush-suction irrigation. © 2006 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33751030630&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/bot.0b013e31802b41e2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17106380; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00005131-200611000-00007; https://journals.lww.com/00005131-200611000-00007; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/bot.0b013e31802b41e2; https://insights.ovid.com/article/00005131-200611000-00007
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know