Motor control exercises reduces pain and disability in chronic and recurrent low back pain: A meta-analysis
Spine, ISSN: 0362-2436, Vol: 38, Issue: 6, Page: E350-8
2013
- 137Citations
- 497Captures
- 2Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations137
- Citation Indexes118
- 118
- CrossRef64
- Policy Citations19
- 19
- Captures497
- Readers497
- 497
- Mentions2
- News Mentions2
- 2
Most Recent News
Efficacy of Exercises in Individuals With Non-specific Chronic Low Back Pain
STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Efficacy of Motor Control Exercises and Resistance Training on Pain, Function, Kinesiophobia and Trunk Strength in Individuals With Non-specific Chronic Low
Article Description
STUDY DESIGN. Meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials. OBJECTIVE. To determine the short-term, intermediate, and long-term effectiveness of MCE, with regard to pain and disability, in patients with chronic and recurrent low-back pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA. Previous meta-analyses have shown no difference between the effects of MCE and general exercise in the treatment of low back pain. Several high quality studies on this topic have been published lately, warranting a new meta-analysis. METHODS. We searched electronic databases up to October 2011 for randomized controlled trials clearly distinguishing MCE from other treatments. We extracted pain and disability outcomes and converted them to a 0 to 100 scale. We used the RevMan5 (Nordic Cochrane Centre, Copenhagen, Denmark) software to perform pooled analyses to determine the weighted mean differences (WMDs) between MCE and 5 different control interventions. RESULTS. Sixteen studies were included. The pooled results favored MCE compared with general exercise with regard to disability during all time periods (improvement in WMDs ranged from -4.65 to -4.86), and with regard to pain in the short and intermediate term (WMDs were -7.80 and -6.06, respectively). Compared with spinal manual therapy, MCE was superior with regard to disability during all time periods (the WMDs ranged between -5.27 and -6.12), but not with regard to pain. Furthermore, MCE was superior to minimal intervention during all time periods with regard to both pain (the WMDs ranged between -10.18 and -13.32) and disability (the WMDs ranged between -5.62 and -9.00). CONCLUSION. In patients with chronic and recurrent low back pain, MCE seem to be superior to several other treatments. More studies are, however, needed to investigate what subgroups of patients experiencing LBP respond best to MCE. © 2013, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84875605917&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e31828435fb; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23492976; http://journals.lww.com/00007632-201303150-00018; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007632-201303150-00018; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828435fb; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828435fb; https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/Abstract/2013/03150/Motor_Control_Exercises_Reduces_Pain_and.18.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know