Role of nonhuman primates in the evaluation of candidate AIDS vaccines: An industry perspective
Current Opinion in HIV and AIDS, ISSN: 1746-630X, Vol: 5, Issue: 5, Page: 377-385
2010
- 13Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations13
- Citation Indexes13
- 13
- CrossRef12
- Captures13
- Readers13
- 13
Review Description
Purpose of review: To consider how nonhuman primate (NHP) model systems can best contribute to HIV vaccine development. Recent Findings: We review the traditional roles of NHP model systems in vaccine development and compare this with how NHP models have been used in HIV vaccine research and development. Comparisons of the immune responses elicited by cellular immune response-inducing vaccines in macaques and humans illustrate the value of primate studies for the relative ranking of HIV vaccine concepts for their likely immunogenicity in humans. The unusual structures (e.g. long complementarity-determining regions) of known broadly neutralizing HIV antibodies (bNAbs) suggest that it is critical to test candidate env immunogens in NHPs, whose germline antibody repertoires resemble those of humans. Recent clinical efficacy trial results question the utility of existing NHP challenge models in predicting HIV vaccine efficacy in humans, and highlight the need to further develop models in which acquisition of infection can be reliably evaluated. When evaluated in models using low virus dose challenges that better approximate human sexual exposure to HIV - some vaccine and passive NAb interventions appear to protect against acquisition of infection. Summary: NHP models have important roles in the preclinical evaluation, optimization, and ranking of novel HIV immunogens. The apparent vaccine efficacy observed using low virus dose challenge models provides an opportunity to investigate the correlates of protection. © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77955518774&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/coh.0b013e32833d2e19; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20978377; http://journals.lww.com/01222929-201009000-00005; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=01222929-201009000-00005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/coh.0b013e32833d2e19; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=01222929-201009000-00005
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know