Cancer Chemotherapy: The Case for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring, ISSN: 1536-3694, Vol: 42, Issue: 1, Page: 6-19
2020
- 66Citations
- 91Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations66
- Citation Indexes66
- 66
- CrossRef52
- Captures91
- Readers91
- 91
Review Description
The selection of an appropriate therapy and dosing regimen is a significant challenge in the treatment of cancer. Although there are recommended standardized chemotherapy protocols for some types of cancer, protocol changes that usually only occur after large clinical trials demonstrate improvements and individual patients often require dose modifications (amount or interval) or delays in dose administration as toxicities arise. In other areas of medicine, therapeutic drug monitoring is commonly and successfully used to ensure appropriate drug exposure and to limit dose-related toxicities. Currently, the wide pharmacokinetic variability of cytotoxic chemotherapies is addressed clinically by the use of body surface area to determine drug doses; however, this is outdated and demonstrably ineffective for this purpose. This review discusses the challenges of dosing cytotoxic chemotherapies, dose determination strategies for cytotoxic, targeted, and antibody-based biological anticancer drugs, and provides an overview of the recent literature regarding the use of therapeutic drug monitoring in cancer.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85077761454&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000000701; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31568180; https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000701; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ftd.0000000000000701; https://journals.lww.com/drug-monitoring/Abstract/2020/02000/Cancer_Chemotherapy__The_Case_for_Therapeutic_Drug.2.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know