Menopausal hormone therapy for breast cancer survivors
Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology, ISSN: 1473-656X, Vol: 37, Issue: 1, Page: 37-41
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Purpose of review The global incidence of breast cancer continues to increase and increasing efficacy of treatments has improved overall prognosis and survival with a resulting requisite focus on improving quality of life after cancer. Treatment inevitably results in symptoms of menopause and these symptoms may be more severe after cancer treatment compared to natural menopause and may pose a potential risk of early treatment discontinuation. Consequently, the global burden of successfully managing these symptoms is significant. Recent findings There is a discordance between randomized and observational data regarding the risk of systemic menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer recurrence; hormone receptor status is significant to recurrence risk in this setting. The systemic absorption of local oestrogen is not a consistent surrogate marker for cancer recurrence and clinical data has not demonstrated a consistent increase in the risk of cancer recurrence with local therapy. Summary Nonhormonal treatments remain first-line management of menopause symptoms in breast cancer survivors to minimize the risk of cancer recurrence. However, severe symptoms not responding to nonhormonal interventions require a multidisciplinary, patient-centred approach to discuss the evidence base for hormonal treatments.
Bibliographic Details
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know