Biological pacemakers as a therapy for cardiac arrhythmias
Current Opinion in Cardiology, ISSN: 0268-4705, Vol: 23, Issue: 1, Page: 46-54
2008
- 23Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef18
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Review Description
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cardiac rhythm disorders are caused by malfunctions of impulse generation or conduction. Malfunctions of impulse generation, that is, defects in pacemaking, are often life-threatening. Present therapies span a wide array of approaches, but remain largely palliative. Recent progress in understanding of the underlying biology of pacemaking opens up new prospects for better alternatives to the present routine. Specifically, development and use of biological pacemakers could prove to be advantageous to the conventional approaches. RECENT FINDINGS: We review the current state of the art in gene and cell-based approaches to correct cardiac rhythm disturbances. These include genetic suppression of an ionic current, embryonic as well as adult stem cell therapies, novel synthetic pacemaker channels, and adult somatic cell-fusion approach. SUMMARY: Biological pacemaking can be achieved by modulating ionic currents by gene transfer or by delivering engineered pacemaker cells into normally quiescent myocardium. The present state of development is proof-of-concept; we are now working on reducing to practice a stable, reliable biological product as an alternative to electronic pacemakers. © 2008 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=40349092932&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/hco.0b013e3282f30416; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18281827; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00001573-200801000-00009; https://journals.lww.com/00001573-200801000-00009; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/hco.0b013e3282f30416; https://insights.ovid.com/ShowUpgradeBrowserMessage
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know