Restrictive cardiomyopathy
Current Opinion in Cardiology, ISSN: 0268-4705, Vol: 24, Issue: 3, Page: 214-220
2009
- 75Citations
- 78Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations75
- Citation Indexes74
- 74
- CrossRef56
- Clinical Citations1
- 1
- Captures78
- Readers78
- 78
Review Description
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Restrictive cardiomyopathy (RCM) is an uncommon myocardial disease characterized by impaired filling of the ventricles in the presence of normal wall thickness and systolic function. Most affected individuals have severe signs and symptoms of heart failure. A large number die shortly after diagnosis unless they receive a cardiac transplant. Controversy has existed about the exact definition of the condition and diagnostic criteria that will be discussed along with an update on recent findings. RECENT FINDINGS: Previously, RCM was believed to be of idiopathic origin unless otherwise associated with inflammatory, infiltrative or systemic disease. Recent investigations have shown that the condition may be caused by mutations in sarcomeric disease genes and even may coexist with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the same family. However, most sarcomeric RCM mutations appear to be de novo and associated with a severe disease expression and an early onset. SUMMARY: Recent reports suggest that mutations in sarcomeric contractile protein genes are not uncommon in RCM. These findings imply that RCM may be hereditary, and that clinical assessment of relatives should be considered in addition to genetic investigations when systemic disease has been excluded. Identification and risk stratification of affected relatives is important to avoid adverse disease complications and diminish the rate of sudden death. © 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67651030622&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/hco.0b013e32832a1d2e; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19593902; https://journals.lww.com/00001573-200905000-00004; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00001573-200905000-00004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/hco.0b013e32832a1d2e; https://journals.lww.com/co-cardiology/Abstract/2009/05000/Restrictive_cardiomyopathy.4.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know