A systematic review of suicidality in people with intellectual disabilities
Harvard Review of Psychiatry, ISSN: 1465-7309, Vol: 24, Issue: 3, Page: 202-213
2016
- 30Citations
- 91Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations30
- Citation Indexes28
- 28
- CrossRef8
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Captures91
- Readers91
- 91
Review Description
Background: Suicidality in people with intellectual disability has not been extensively researched. Aim: To identify the nature of the research that has actually been conducted on this topic. A search of research databases was conducted according to predefined criteria. Key information was extracted and rated for methodological merit. Results: Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria for this systematic review. The aspects of suicidality investigated, which varied among studies, included suicidal attempts, behavior, ideation, and completed suicide. Thirteen studies highlighted risk factors for suicidality in this population. The most frequently noted risk factors were a concurrent mental health difficulty and the level of intellectual disability. Eight studies referred to people with intellectual disabilities’ understanding of the concept of death or suicide. Various methodological issues were identified in the studies included. Conclusions: In what we believe to be first systematic review of suicidality in people with intellectual disabilities, it was apparent that well-designed, standardized research studies on the topic are scarce. There is consequently limited evidence to guide prevention and intervention strategies for suicidality in this population.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85024402608&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/hrp.0000000000000095; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27148912; https://journals.lww.com/00023727-201605000-00003; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00023727-201605000-00003; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/hrp.0000000000000095; https://insights.ovid.com/article/00023727-201605000-00003
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know