Comparison of spectral domain optical coherence tomography scan patterns and clinical review strategies in neovascular agerelated macular degeneration
Retina, ISSN: 1539-2864, Vol: 35, Issue: 7, Page: 1315-1322
2015
- 6Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations6
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef6
- Captures23
- Readers23
- 23
Review Description
Purpose: To compare various spectral domain optical coherence tomography scan patterns and review strategies to identify an optimal imaging workflow for neovascular agerelated macular degeneration. Methods: A retrospective consecutive case series was performed in eyes after antivascular endothelial growth factor therapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration with concurrent spectral domain optical coherence tomography imaging (Zeiss Cirrus), including horizontal/vertical five-line rasters, and macular cube analysis. For each scan pattern, a single report was independently reviewed in a masked fashion within the clinical image review software, whereas the cube was reviewed line-by-line in the reader software for the presence of fluid. Results: One hundred and fifty-six reports and 39 cube scans of 39 patients were included. Among all spectral domain optical coherence tomography scans, 64% (25/39) had definitive fluid and 95% (37/39) had possible fluid. Sensitivities for definite fluid detection for horizontal, combined horizontal/vertical, and horizontal/vertical/map reviews were 68%, 76%, and 88%, respectively. When assessing for possible fluid, sensitivities for the detection for horizontal, combined horizontal/vertical, and horizontal/vertical/map reviews were 76%, 92%, and 97%, respectively. Line-by-line review of the cube scan had a sensitivity for definite and possible fluid detection of 96% and 86%, respectively. Conclusion: Optimizing both clinical accuracy and workflow are important factors in managing neovascular age-related macular degeneration. A zero-tolerance strategy with vertical/horizontal raster scans and thickness maps was comparable with line-by-line review of the cube to detect possible fluid.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84942588920&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000478; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25658176; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00006982-201507000-00004; https://journals.lww.com/00006982-201507000-00004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000000478; https://journals.lww.com/retinajournal/Abstract/2015/07000/COMPARISON_OF_SPECTRAL_DOMAIN_OPTICAL_COHERENCE.4.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know