PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Prospective randomized controlled trial of combination ranibizumab (lucentis) and bromfenac (xibrom) for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: A pilot study

Retina, ISSN: 0275-004X, Vol: 32, Issue: 3, Page: 417-423
2012
  • 38
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 48
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Article Description

Purpose: To evaluate whether bromfenac eyedrops and ranibizumab intravitreal injections would provide added efficacy over ranibizumab alone. Methods: This was a single-site, multiinvestigator, prospective, open-label, interventional, Phase II study of patients with new or recurrent exudative/neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Thirty eyes were enrolled consecutively and were randomized in a ratio of 2:1 to combination therapy with intravitreal ranibizumab and topical bromfenac, and ranibizumab alone. All patients received ranibizumab monthly therapy for 4 months then as needed monthly in accordance with standard of care. Patients receiving bromfenac self-administered 1 drop twice a day for 12 months. Patients were followed for 12 months. Results: There were no safety concerns with the combination therapy. No statistically significant differences were identified in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study best-corrected visual acuity or the number of injections required. However, the mean 12-month change in central macular thickness in the combination group was -81.56 μm while in the ranibizumab group alone the change was -42.50 μm (P = 0.03). The proportion of eyes experiencing a decrease in CMT of 50 μm or more was also significantly higher in those receiving combination therapy (P = 0.046). Conclusion: This pilot study is the first to prospectively identify a biologic signal that may indicate combination therapy with an easily administered well-tolerated eyedrop and ranibizumab is efficacious for the treatment of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Further studies are warranted to validate this finding. © The Ophthalmic Communications Society, Inc.

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know