Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device implanted under a scleral flap alone or combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery
Journal of Glaucoma, ISSN: 1057-0829, Vol: 18, Issue: 6, Page: 488-491
2009
- 100Citations
- 42Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations100
- Citation Indexes100
- 100
- CrossRef54
- Captures42
- Readers42
- 42
Article Description
Purpose: Our purpose was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma device placed under a partial-thickness scleral flap as a single procedure or combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Methods: This was a comparative consecutive case series of 345 eyes: 231 eyes treated with Ex-PRESS implant under scleral flap alone and 114 eyes treated with Ex-PRESS implant under scleral flap combined with phacoemulsification (both groups were treated intraoperatively with mitomycin C). Results: The patients were followed for 25.7±11.1 (range, 1 to 46.2) months (Ex-PRESS alone) and 21.9±12.5 (range, 1.9 to 46.2) months (combined cases). At 3 years after surgery, surgical success was 94.8% and 95.6% in the Ex-PRESS and combined groups, respectively (P=0.948). Compared with baseline values, the postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and number of glaucoma medications were significantly lowered in both groups. The change from baseline IOP was significantly greater after Ex-PRESS implant alone compared with combined surgery (P<0.001). The most common device-related complication was obstruction of the tube (6 eyes), which was treated successfully with Nd:YAG laser in all 6 eyes. Conclusions: The use of the Ex-PRESS implant under a scleral flap was effective for lowering IOP both alone and combined with cataract surgery. The most common device-related complication was tube blockage, which was treated with the Nd: YAG laser. © 2009 by Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=67650920269&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0b013e31818fb44e; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19223790; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00061198-200908000-00012; http://journals.lww.com/00061198-200908000-00012; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ijg.0b013e31818fb44e; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00061198-200908000-00012
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know