Anophthalmic syndrome: A review of management
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, ISSN: 1537-2677, Vol: 30, Issue: 5, Page: 361-365
2014
- 21Citations
- 34Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations21
- Citation Indexes21
- 21
- CrossRef9
- Captures34
- Readers34
- 32
Review Description
Purpose: To review and summarize current management of anophthalmic syndrome - enophthalmos, superior sulcus syndrome, lower eyelid laxity, and upper eyelid ptosis. Methods: The authors performed a PubMed search of all articles published in English on the management of anophthalmic socket syndrome. Results: A review of 37 articles demonstrated that anophthalmic syndrome occurs in a significant proportion of this patient population. Primary prevention through careful selection of primary orbital implant is ideal. Residual mild deficits can then be corrected through prosthesis modification. When modification of the prosthesis is no longer sufficient, specifically targeted procedures become necessary. Conclusions: Ocularists and oculoplastic surgeons should work together closely to treat anophthalmic syndrome. Future studies should establish uniform measurement criteria as the next step in validating the benefit and limitation of each technique.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84914708644&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/iop.0000000000000217; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24988502; https://journals.lww.com/00002341-201409000-00001; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00002341-201409000-00001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/iop.0000000000000217; https://journals.lww.com/op-rs/Abstract/2014/09000/Anophthalmic_Syndrome___A_Review_of_Management.1.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know