Risk factors associated with haptic malposition in eyes implanted with implantable collamer lenses
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery, ISSN: 1873-4502, Vol: 50, Issue: 3, Page: 276-282
2024
- 3Citations
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations3
- Citation Indexes3
- CrossRef1
- Captures7
- Readers7
Article Description
Purpose:To examine the risk factors for haptic malposition in eyes with implantable collamer lens (ICL).Setting:Eye and ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.Design:Prospective nonrandomized observational study.Methods:This study included 134 (77.9%) of 172 initially enrolled patients who underwent ICL implantation and completed a 1-year follow-up. The extent of haptics present in the ciliary sulcus (ICS) was measured. Patients were categorized based on ICS count (0 to 4). The position of the haptics was quantified as the distance between the iris root and the terminal tip of ICL haptics (iris root to haptic tip, IRH). The related factors to the ICS count and its correlation with the central vault were analyzed.Results:ICS distribution was 0 ICS in 19 eyes (14.2%), 1 in 22 eyes (16.4%), 2 in 32 eyes (23.9%), 3 in 29 eyes (21.6%), and 4 in 32 eyes (23.9%). Parameters like maximum ciliary body thickness (CBTmax, P =.008), iris-ciliary process distance (ICPD, P <.001), and ciliary process length (P =.034) varied significantly across ICS groups. A multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the iris-ciliary angle (P =.006), CBTmax (P =.007), the distance between the sulcus-to-sulcus plane and the anterior crystalline lens surface (STSL, P =.035), and ICL size (P =.015) were significantly associated with IRH. Spherical equivalents (P =.042), STSL (P =.001), and ICS count (P =.020) significantly correlated with the central vault.Conclusions:Shortened ciliary process is a primary risk for haptic malposition. The ICS count significantly relates to the central vault.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85185717536&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001368; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38031330; https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001368; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001368; https://journals.lww.com/jcrs/abstract/9900/risk_factors_associated_with_haptic_malposition_in.333.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know