A systematic review of the evidence concerning the economic impact of employee-focused health promotion and wellness programs
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, ISSN: 1076-2752, Vol: 55, Issue: 2, Page: 209-222
2013
- 79Citations
- 163Captures
- 4Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations79
- Citation Indexes74
- 74
- CrossRef49
- Policy Citations5
- Policy Citation5
- Captures163
- Readers163
- 163
- Mentions4
- News Mentions2
- News2
- References2
- Wikipedia2
Most Recent News
ULTIMATE SOFTWARE : Holistic Well-Being Was a Hot Topic at #HRTech2018 (And it Should be in Your Org, Too)
[Attachment] I first came across the term 'The Wellness Effect' in an investment article discussing the symbiotic relationship between employee financial wellness and financial returns
Article Description
Objective:: To assess the evidence regarding the economic impact of worker health promotion programs. Objective:: Peer-reviewed research articles were identified from a database search. Included articles were published between January 2000 and May 2010, described a study conducted in the United States that used an experimental or quasi-experimental study design and analyzed medical, pharmacy (direct), and/or work productivity (indirect) costs. A multidisciplinary review team, following specific criteria, assessed research quality. Results:: Of 2030 retrieved articles, 44 met study inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 were of sufficient quality to be considered evidentiary. Only three analyzed direct and indirect costs. Conclusions:: Evidence regarding economic impact is limited and inconsistent. Higher-quality research is needed to demonstrate the value of specific programs. © 2013 by American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84873999913&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/jom.0b013e3182728d3c; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23287723; https://journals.lww.com/00043764-201302000-00015; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00043764-201302000-00015; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182728d3c; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0b013e3182728d3c; https://journals.lww.com/joem/Abstract/2013/02000/A_Systematic_Review_of_the_Evidence_Concerning_the.15.aspx; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=XGSfZQk1svT3X4YKMfJ3YkpRjchSvhtxMpMrWGSjLT18z9zSmhkJ!148317982!181195628!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00043764-201302000-00015; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=V9JZM3CWklvmtg0bqy3hz0QrSrD1pz3qhlLwrcLZ9fkmQJYgprGp!-236459650!181195628!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00043764-201302000-00015; https://journals.lww.com/joem/Fulltext/2013/02000/A_Systematic_Review_of_the_Evidence_Concerning_the.15.aspx; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00043764-201302000-00015; https://insights.ovid.com/Common/SSRPdf/V1/JOURNAL%2fjoem%2f04.02%2f00043764-201302000-00015%2froot%2fv%2f2017-07-26T055516Z%2fr%2fapplication-pdf; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=YfxGD4vNffLwVTh1GQlXmPqz82587dyV5wMLdq0MJC0mGngvcLFW!-2019193196!181195628!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00043764-201302000-00015; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?an=00043764-201302000-00015
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know