Fabric-based exocervical and endocervical biopsy in comparison with punch biopsy and sharp curettage
Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease, ISSN: 1089-2591, Vol: 16, Issue: 2, Page: 80-87
2012
- 4Citations
- 18Captures
- 95Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent News
UPDATE: Research Supports Compassionate New Biopsy Approach for Women's Health in Cervical Cancer Prevention
ANAHEIM, Calif. , Aug. 9, 2017 /PRNewswire/ -- A recent study compares new, safe, single-use disposable biopsy curettes tipped with a medical fabric (Kylon®) with the
Article Description
OBJECTIVES: Fabric-based endocervical and exocervical biopsy tools were compared with exocervical punch biopsy and sharp endocervical curettage. We compared the level of pain reported by the patient and the amount of bleeding rated by the physician relative to the type of biopsy used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a 2-center institutional review board-approved study of patients undergoing colposcopy. One center randomized patients to undergo either conventional (punch biopsy, sharp endocervical curettage) or fabric-based biopsy of the endocervix and exocervix, and a second center enrolled nonrandomized controls. The patient and physician subjectively rated bleeding (exocervical) and pain (endocervical and exocervical) from the biopsy procedure(s), which were compared using the nonparametric Wilcoxon test. RESULTS: Exocervical and endocervical biopsies from 55 patients were compared. Fabric-based biopsies were abundant full-thickness curettage and showed statistically significant less pain and bleeding than the conventional biopsy methods (p < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Fabric-based biopsies are significantly less traumatic than conventional biopsies. The benefits of a less-invasive biopsy could increase the willingness to perform multiple biopsies, increase disease detection, and improve patient satisfaction, which could impact future gynecologic health-seeking behavior and compliance with colposcopy recall. © 2012 The American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84858147886&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/lgt.0b013e318234262d; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22371040; https://journals.lww.com/00128360-201204000-00002; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00128360-201204000-00002; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/lgt.0b013e318234262d; https://insights.ovid.com/article/00128360-201204000-00002; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=VnGMVZJdmCTgpXbHRtlqx7F3rWmrlyv9g8hvgBrYXs21tKy6qhP1!-1552477860!181195628!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00128360-201204000-00002; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=WZqb0nDYwlGLVnLGzB7Lqn4QN5c1qdVHrdGRGPRdpZRnghJn11QS!-999504534!181195629!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00128360-201204000-00002; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=X2SdffRTg0QxB5tqgpWGhGnGkJTLMZVC0Y7GVKLv2LYyqsKnLhFs!-1137085489!181195628!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00128360-201204000-00002; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=VG2TvKh1HdTN1T0hxLXD2MjFTJ8r2cJ4J3hbSbmQvpnGyLKwLzBC!-672478046!181195629!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00128360-201204000-00002; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=VV4Fjrvwp1ShHY2Kh2VX8GGXPCQxYbXQnZ1kQKJM2rZDLSfWxnMj!-672478046!181195629!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00128360-201204000-00002; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=Yb2hwRlcJCVWQzb36k1h6R7PD92QpP6S7Bk3JLlnZJ2KScPStlnN!1080955772!181195628!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00128360-201204000-00002; https://journals.lww.com/jlgtd/Fulltext/2012/04000/Fabric_Based_Exocervical_and_Endocervical_Biopsy.2.aspx; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=V0LbHMCwwBMKLFxVtKNyzpzbXSnG1JGLS00SDGR9kXGRysv2vK2v!1091540850!181195628!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00128360-201204000-00002; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?an=00128360-201204000-00002
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know