A new wide-diameter bone-anchored hearing implantvprospective 1-year data on complications, implant stability, and survival
Otology and Neurotology, ISSN: 1537-4505, Vol: 35, Issue: 7, Page: 1238-1241
2014
- 23Citations
- 26Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations23
- Citation Indexes23
- 23
- CrossRef13
- Captures26
- Readers26
- 26
Article Description
Objective: To investigate a new wide bone-anchored hearing implant considering initial stability, stability over time, implant loss, and skin reaction. Study Design: Consecutive, prospective case series. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Twenty adult patients were enrolled. All operations were 1-stage, single-incision technique with subcutaneous reduction. Intervention(s): Measurement of implant stability. Main Outcome Measure(s): Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values were recorded using resonance frequency analysis at the time of implantation and at 10 days, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after surgery. Skin and soft tissue reactions according to Holgers grading system. Results: Implant stability quotient measurements revealed a significant increase in ISQ during the first 10 days after operation, and the ISQ values continued to rise throughout the 1-year observation period. No implants were lost. Skin and soft tissue reactions were rare and minor, as no reaction was seen in 93% of the follow-up examinations and no grade 4 reactions occurred. Conclusion: The new wide implant showed good stability at surgery. Osseointegration was fast, and implant stability increased throughout the 1-year observation period. No implants were lost. Skin and soft tissue reactions were rare and minor. Key Words: Bone-anchored hearing systemVResonance frequency analysisV ImplantVImplant stability quotientVOsseointegrationVSkin reaction.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85038891639&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mao.0000000000000345; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24608379; https://journals.lww.com/00129492-201408000-00023; https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000345; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000345; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000345; https://journals.lww.com/otology-neurotology/toc/9000/00000
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know