Pathogenesis of muscle wasting in cancer cachexia: Targeted anabolic and anticatabolic therapies
Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care, ISSN: 1363-1950, Vol: 13, Issue: 4, Page: 410-416
2010
- 44Citations
- 73Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations44
- Citation Indexes44
- 44
- CrossRef31
- Captures73
- Readers73
- 73
Review Description
Purpose of review: Cancer-related muscle loss, or cachexia, is the cause of death for approximately 2 million people worldwide and severely reduces quality of life. The degree of cachexia is inversely correlated with survival time; however, the exact mechanisms behind cancer-induced muscle wasting remain under investigation. RECENT FINDINGS: Cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-α trigger degradatory pathways through nuclear factor-κB signaling that activate the ubiquitin-proteasome system and muscle proteolysis. Androgen treatment has been shown to reduce inflammatory cytokines and even stimulate anti-inflammatory cytokine production. Amino acid supplementation has been shown to induce muscle protein synthesis in ovarian cancer patients. Summary: Targeted anabolic therapies aimed at preventing or reversing cancer cachexia might involve the combined use of androgens and amino acids working concurrently to enhance muscle protein synthesis and reduce muscle protein breakdown. Additional focused clinical studies are needed to identify muscle-specific targets or biomarkers for defined therapeutic approaches to slow or prevent cancer cachexia. In this review, we summarize the pathogenesis of cancer-related muscle wasting and discuss potential interventions at reversing or preventing cancer-related muscle loss. © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77954348785&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mco.0b013e328339fdd2; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20473155; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00075197-201007000-00012; http://journals.lww.com/00075197-201007000-00012; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mco.0b013e328339fdd2; https://journals.lww.com/co-clinicalnutrition/Abstract/2010/07000/Pathogenesis_of_muscle_wasting_in_cancer_cachexia_.12.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know