Pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: Is the evidence strengthening?
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, ISSN: 1531-6971, Vol: 24, Issue: 2, Page: 147-151
2018
- 10Citations
- 54Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Review Description
Purpose of review This manuscript aims to review the most recent evidence about the benefits of early pulmonary rehabilitation commenced during an acute exacerbation in people with COPD (AECOPD). Recent findings A number of RCTs and an observational study, published between 2015 and 2017, have used different exercise interventions compared with usual medical care in people with moderate-To-severe COPD during an AECOPD. The results show short-Term improvement in walking distance, muscle strength, quality of life and anxiety and depression. Summary The evidence about early rehabilitation during AECOPD is growing in strength; however, the outcomes and interventions that were used in the RCTs varied from study to study. Unlike pulmonary rehabilitation for people with stable COPD, there is no ideal model of early rehabilitation for people with AECOPD and little information about long-Term benefits, for example, attendance at outpatient-based pulmonary rehabilitation and hospital admissions and length of stay. Because of the risks of deconditioning during an AECOPD and the related healthcare costs, early rehabilitation should commence at the bedside. However, more research is required determine the best way to provide early rehabilitation for people with AECOPD.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85042465927&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mcp.0000000000000453; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29210749; http://Insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00063198-900000000-99249; https://journals.lww.com/00063198-201803000-00008; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mcp.0000000000000453; https://journals.lww.com/co-pulmonarymedicine/Abstract/2018/03000/Pulmonary_rehabilitation_for_patients_with_acute.8.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know