Rotational thromboelastometry predicts transplant-free survival in patients with liver cirrhosis
European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ISSN: 1473-5687
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Article Description
Background and aims Emerging evidence suggests that rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) is superior to conventional haemostatic tests in the assessment and management of bleeding risk in patients with cirrhosis. Whether ROTEM may also be useful for assessing the prognosis of these patients is unknown. We aimed to explore the role of ROTEM in predicting the transplant-free survival of patients with cirrhosis. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with cirrhosis at two hospitals. All patients underwent ROTEM analysis at baseline and were followed up until death, liver transplantation or the end of follow-up (28 February 2023). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to explore the association between transplant-free survivals. Results Between April 2018 and October 2021, 162 patients with cirrhosis were recruited and followed-up for a median of 42 months. During follow-up, 36 patients died and 7 underwent liver transplantation. On univariate analysis, maximum clot firmness (MCF) using both EXTEM and INTEM tests was significantly reduced in the death/liver transplant group compared to the survivor group (52 vs. 57, P = 0.02; and 51 vs. 55, P = 0.01, respectively). After adjusting for age, sex, presence of clinically significant portal hypertension, hepatocellular carcinoma, care setting, bilirubin, sodium and creatinine, only albumin (hazard ratio: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.85–0.99, P = 0.018) and MCF (hazard ratio: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92–0.99, P = 0.032) remained significant predictors of transplant-free survival. Conclusion ROTEM may be useful in assessing the survival of patients with cirrhosis. Further research is needed to determine the clinical utility of ROTEM parameters as prognostic markers in cirrhosis.
Bibliographic Details
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know