Erythropoietin mimetic peptides and erythropoietin fusion proteins for treating anemia of chronic kidney disease
Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, ISSN: 1473-6543, Vol: 27, Issue: 5, Page: 345-350
2018
- 5Citations
- 21Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef2
- Captures21
- Readers21
- 21
Review Description
Purpose of review First generation erythropoiesis stimulating agents (ESAs) have short duration of action which requires administration once weekly or greater. Second generation ESAs were developed which have longer duration of action and can be administered one to two times monthly. Erythropoietin (EPO) mimetic peptides (EMPs) activate the EPO receptor but have no structural analogy to EPO, offering the potential for lower cost as they are not biologic drugs. The first approved EMP, peginesatide, was withdrawn from the market within a year of its approval because of fatal anaphylactic reactions. In this review, we summarize recent progress regarding the development of newer, possibly less toxic, EMPs. We also summarize the development of EPO fusion proteins which fuse EPO with a portion of an immunoglobulin molecule or another EPO molecule, achieving a longer duration of action and less frequent dosing. Recent findings AGEM400(hydroxyethyl starch) and pegolsihematide are EMPs in phase II clinical trials. Three EPO fusion proteins are under development, two in phase I and one in phase II. Summary The future success of EMPs is limited by the prior experience with peginesatide and EPO fusion proteins do not offer cost savings or longer duration of action than currently available ESAs.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85056478938&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mnh.0000000000000430; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29746307; http://journals.lww.com/00041552-201809000-00005; http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00041552-201809000-00005; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00041552-201809000-00005
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know