Advanced imaging of the gastrointestinal tract: Research vs. clinical tools?
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, ISSN: 0267-1379, Vol: 25, Issue: 5, Page: 412-421
2009
- 43Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations43
- Citation Indexes43
- 43
- CrossRef36
- Captures31
- Readers31
- 31
Review Description
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Diagnostic endoscopy has moved forward considerably in the recent years. Still, three major needs have to be satisfied: endoscopy should be able to detect a lesion, characterize the lesion, and then its nature should be confirmed. These steps should ideally translate into an immediate therapeutic decision. RECENT FINDINGS: High definition endoscopy has optimized our endoscopic view onto the mucosa and can be combined with digital surface enhancement modalities. Chromoendoscopy still holds a place to detect especially flat lesions in high-risk patients such as ulcerative colitis. Digital chromoendoscopy techniques such as narrow band imaging, i-scan, or Fuji intelligent chromo endoscopy offer new possibilities of easily and reversibly obtaining enhanced tissue contrast. Autofluorescence imaging uses tissue function to yield a pseudocolored image, and has potential to serve as a red flag technique for the detection of neoplastic lesions. Confocal laser endomicroscopy has for the first time provided real time microscopy. In addition to visualizing morphology, functional and molecular imaging open new horizons for the gastroenterologist. SUMMARY: Advanced imaging techniques have provided the endoscopist with an armamentarium of novel modalities for detection, characterization and microscopy of lesions during endoscopy. In addition, functional and molecular imaging give insight into dynamic processes of tissues in their natural surroundings. © 2009 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=69749091748&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mog.0b013e32832d62c1; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19474725; http://journals.lww.com/00001574-200909000-00004; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00001574-200909000-00004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mog.0b013e32832d62c1; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00001574-200909000-00004
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know