Gastroduodenal motility
Current Opinion in Gastroenterology, ISSN: 0267-1379, Vol: 26, Issue: 6, Page: 647-655
2010
- 33Citations
- 66Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations33
- Citation Indexes33
- 33
- CrossRef26
- Captures66
- Readers66
- 66
Review Description
Purpose of review: Abnormalities of gastroduodenal motility are considered key players in the pathogenesis of upper gastrointestinal symptoms in disorders such as functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis. Abnormalities of sensory control are considered another important factor that contributes to symptom generation. This review summarizes recent progress in our understanding of gastroduodenal motility and sensitivity in health and in disease. Recent findinds: Although gastric and small intestinal motility remain an important focus of research, including the application of the SmartPill (SmartPill Corp., Buffalo, New York, USA) wireless motility monitoring capsule, duodenal sensitivity and low-grade duodenal inflammation are new areas of interest in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia. A number of genetic polymorphisms associated with functional dyspepsia are being investigated, but large-scale studies are still lacking. Central processing of visceral stimuli, and its role in the pathogenesis of functional dyspepsia, is another important emerging topic. Therapeutic studies have reported on novel pharmacological approaches in functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis, as well as gastric electrical stimulation in the treatment of refractory gastroparesis. Summary: There is gradual progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis of gastroduodenal symptoms. Areas of recent advances including the recognition of low-grade duodenal inflammation, the role of central nervous system processing in visceral hypersensitivity and the exploration of novel pharmacotherapeutic approaches. © 2010 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77958514651&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mog.0b013e32833ece1e; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20838344; http://journals.lww.com/00001574-201011000-00018; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mog.0b013e32833ece1e; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00001574-201011000-00018
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know