Indication and timing of cystectomy in high-risk bladder cancer
Current Opinion in Urology, ISSN: 0963-0643, Vol: 22, Issue: 5, Page: 427-431
2012
- 7Citations
- 18Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes6
- CrossRef5
- Clinical Citations1
- 1
- Captures18
- Readers18
- 18
Review Description
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although the conservative approach including Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) therapy is considered as the first-line option in high-risk nonmuscle invasive bladder tumors, cystectomy is often required as an alternative treatment in the case of BCG failure. Considering all the parameters, including clinical data, endoscopic aspects and new biological markers, the question of the indication, and moreover timing, of cystectomy has become crucial. RECENT FINDINGS: In fact, the real positive effect of BCG remains controversial and its actual benefit in terms of survival is not evident. Therefore, early cystectomy for this population with high risk of progression and metastasis diffusion is clearly a radical approach which can lead to a reduction in specific mortality. Recent articles have studied the parameters involved in this issue to determine the exact timing of cystectomy. SUMMARY: To avoid delay of appropriate treatment, it is crucial to determine the non-BCG responder population. Unfortunately, no consensual marker is currently available. Nevertheless, multifocal tumors, associated carcinoma in situ, prostatic urethral involvement, tumoral size greater than 3cm and depth of infiltration are useful parameters in clinical practice to propose early cystectomy. In the future, the crucial question of cystectomy timing may be answered by progress in molecular signatures for bladder cancers. © 2012 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84864849748&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mou.0b013e328356ac0a; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22814883; https://journals.lww.com/00042307-201209000-00014; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00042307-201209000-00014; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/mou.0b013e328356ac0a; https://journals.lww.com/co-urology/Abstract/2012/09000/Indication_and_timing_of_cystectomy_in_high_risk.14.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know