Pregnancy after Solid Organ Transplantation
MCN The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, ISSN: 1539-0683, Vol: 43, Issue: 2, Page: 89-96
2018
- 4Citations
- 45Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations4
- Citation Indexes4
- CrossRef4
- Captures45
- Readers45
- 45
Article Description
Purpose: To explore the reproductive decision-making process with women who were organ transplant recipients (renal, lung, & heart transplants). Study Design and Methods: Grounded theory guided data collection and analyses. Mixed methods with audiotaped telephone interviews and a written survey measuring social support were used. As social support is critical for women who are organ transplant recipients considering pregnancy, a search for disconfi rming evidence for social support via a survey and interviews was included. Analyses: Verbatim responses were analyzed through the constant comparative method using open, axial, and selective coding. Trustworthiness was established through prolonged engagement, member checking, and thick descriptions. Results: Participants included 10 women who were solid organ recipients (2 lung, 1 heart, and 7 renal transplant recipients). The core theme was Wanting a child. Other themes included Getting information, Advocating, Dealing with problems, Preparing, Talking, Supporting, Coping, and Advising others. There was no evidence of a lack of social support as evaluated via the survey or interviews. Clinical Implications: This study provides new knowledge on clinical decision-making about pregnancy for women who are solid organ recipients and for healthcare professionals. Nurses can use these data to help guide women on how to obtain the most accurate information to make a personal decision about pregnancy and to develop support from their healthcare team and family.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85049241686&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nmc.0000000000000403; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29470267; https://journals.lww.com/00005721-201803000-00005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nmc.0000000000000403; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00005721-201803000-00005
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know