Improving situation awareness and patient outcomes through interdisciplinary rounding and structured communication
Journal of Nursing Administration, ISSN: 0002-0443, Vol: 44, Issue: 3, Page: 164-169
2014
- 25Citations
- 2Usage
- 124Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations25
- Citation Indexes25
- 25
- CrossRef20
- Usage2
- Abstract Views2
- Captures124
- Readers124
- 124
Article Description
OBJECTIVE:: To measure the impact of interdisciplinary rounds (IDRs) and the situation-background-assessment-recommendation (SBAR) communication protocol on staff situation awareness and patient outcomes. BACKGROUND:: Communication frequency and consistency improve speed and clarity, especially between disciplines. Daily IDR using SBAR potentially facilitates the process. METHODS:: Four patient review conditions were observed across 3 medical-surgical units of an acute care hospital: baseline, mobile (IDR only), paper-SBAR, and electronic-SBAR (IDR and SBAR). Observations occurred over a 9-month span. Review time (seconds), tools used, location, and field notes were recorded for 960 patient reviews. RESULTS:: Patient review times were significantly shorter with IDR, decreasing from 102 to 69 seconds, but SBAR did not reduce times further. One patient satisfaction index did not change, whereas the other improved slightly. Length of stay did not change. CONCLUSION:: The structure, consistency, and familiarity afforded by SBAR and IDR resulted in improved situation awareness and provided process, staff, and patient benefits. © 2014 Wolters Kluwer Health I Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84894251020&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nna.0000000000000045; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24531289; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00005110-201403000-00010; https://journals.lww.com/00005110-201403000-00010; https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/facpubs/11993; https://digitalcommons.memphis.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=12992&context=facpubs; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000045; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000045; https://journals.lww.com/jonajournal/Abstract/2014/03000/Improving_Situation_Awareness_and_Patient_Outcomes.10.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know