Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections to reach nonclinic populations in the community: Risk factors for infection in men
Sexually Transmitted Diseases, ISSN: 0148-5717, Vol: 37, Issue: 12, Page: 756-763
2010
- 91Citations
- 71Captures
- 3Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations91
- Citation Indexes86
- 86
- CrossRef66
- Policy Citations5
- 5
- Captures71
- Readers71
- 71
- Mentions3
- News Mentions3
- 3
Most Recent News
Provision of HIV Self-Test Kit to Emergency Department Patients
STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Provision of HIV Self-Test Kit to Increase Uptake of HIV Testing Among Emergency Department Patients Who Decline Emergency Department-Based HIV Screening.
Article Description
Background: Internet-based screening for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) has been acceptable to women, and can reach high-risk populations. No prior published data describe internet-based screening for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis in men. We studied whether internet-based screening was acceptable and reached a high-risk population, and what risk factors were associated with STI positivity. Methods: The website, www.iwantthekit.org, encouraged men â‰114 years of age to request a home self-sampling kit and a questionnaire on risk factors and acceptability of internet-based screening. Penile swabs and urine samples were tested for C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, and T. vaginalis using a nucleic acid amplification test. Risk factors and acceptability were examined using chi squared tests and logistic regression. Results: Of 501 samples received for testing, 106 (21%) were positive for at least one STI, 64 (13%) for chlamydia, 4 (1%) for gonorrhea, and 49 (10%) for trichomonas. In multivariable analyses, age, race, household income, and frequency of condom use were independently associated with infection with at least one STI. Of the total respondents, 34% had a prior STI; 29% reported having a partner with an STI, but only 13% reported always using a condom. Among the men who participated in this study, 77% preferred a self-administered specimen versus attending a clinic, 89% reported that swab use was easy, and 89% reported that they would use internet-based screening again. Conclusions: Men who accessed internet-based screening had known risk factors for STIs and had a high prevalence of infection. Internet-based screening was acceptable and could reach these high-risk men who might not otherwise be reached through traditional means. © 2010 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association All rights reserved.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=78650274697&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/olq.0b013e3181e3d771; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20644498; https://journals.lww.com/00007435-201012000-00005; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007435-201012000-00005; https://facultyopinions.com/prime/7035956#eval7248054; http://dx.doi.org/10.3410/f.7035956.7248054; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/olq.0b013e3181e3d771; https://journals.lww.com/stdjournal/Fulltext/2010/12000/Internet_Based_Screening_for_Sexually_Transmitted.5.aspx; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=YgwQfCJ9jRkh2bj6xy22DHLwBWJTL1YWq61LppFzyr7qGjy6K3Kh!1157359484!181195628!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007435-201012000-00005; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?an=00007435-201012000-00005; http://f1000.com/7035956#eval7248054; http://pt.wkhealth.com/pt/re/lwwgateway/landingpage.htm;jsessionid=YdLSnJRphpvfPhGJ3JLygt2PJZqwTYlQGYnXLDpQ8YpyxXSJ3lfy!-875454884!181195628!8091!-1?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00007435-201012000-00005
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know