Daytime variations in pupil size under photopic conditions
Optometry and Vision Science, ISSN: 1040-5488, Vol: 89, Issue: 2, Page: 197-202
2012
- 7Citations
- 19Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef3
- Captures19
- Readers19
- 19
Article Description
Purpose. To assess the daytime variations in pupil size when far and near targets are viewed under photopic conditions. Methods. We prospectively examined 20 eyes of 20 healthy subjects [27.3 years ± 4.1 (SD)]. Using an open view-type infrared video pupillometer, pupil sizes were measured in subjects looking at targets 5 m or 1/3 m away under photopic conditions (400 lux). The first measurement was performed at 8.00 h, with following measurements at 3-h intervals until 20.00 h. The average pupil size for 5 s consecutive measurements was used for analysis. Results. The respective pupil sizes during far and near viewing were 3.80 ± 0.72 and 3.15 ± 0.62 (mean ± SD); 3.73 ± 0.78 and 3.08 ± 0.70; 3.74 ± 0.82 and 3.06 ± 0.68; 3.79 ± 0.67 and 3.17 ± 0.71; and 3.91 ± 0.76 and 3.13 ± 0.70 mm, at 8.00, 11.00, 14.00, 17.00, and 20.00 h. The pupil sizes did not differ significantly with time over the course of the day [far (p ± 0.94) and near (p ± 0.98) (one-way analysis of variance)]. The daytime variations of pupil size were 0.64 ± 0.33, and 0.41 ± 0.29 mm, respectively. Two eyes (10%) and one eye (5%) showed differences of more than 1.0 mm during daytime hours in pupil sizes while viewing far and near target, respectively. Conclusions. In this study, young adults show no significant variations in photopic pupil size throughout daytime hours. However, a single pupil size measurement appears to be insufficient for clinical use in some eyes. (Optom Vis Sci 2012;89:197-202) © 2012 American Academy of Optometry.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84858157830&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e31824048a9; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22179219; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00006324-201202000-00012; https://journals.lww.com/00006324-201202000-00012; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/opx.0b013e31824048a9; https://insights.ovid.com/article/00006324-201202000-00012
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know