Pancreas transplant: Recent advances and spectrum of features in pancreas allograft pathology
Advances in Anatomic Pathology, ISSN: 1072-4109, Vol: 17, Issue: 3, Page: 202-208
2010
- 17Citations
- 20Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations17
- Citation Indexes17
- CrossRef17
- 16
- Captures20
- Readers20
- 20
Review Description
As result of improved surgical techniques and newer immunosuppressive regimens contributing significantly to better graft survival, exocrine pancreas transplantation remains the standard treatment of choice for patients with diabetes mellitus complicated by end-stage renal disease. Histologic assessment continues to play an important role in the diagnosis of graft complications after pancreas transplantation, especially for evaluating allograft rejection where histopathology is still considered the gold standard. This review elaborates on the current types of pancreas transplants and focuses on the patterns of allograft injury that are encountered in posttransplantation pancreas biopsies along with the pertinent differential diagnoses. In addition to optimal histologic assessment, as in any other organ transplant setting, clinical information including indication and duration of transplant as well as other serologic work-up must be taken into consideration during clinical decision making for optimal graft outcome. © 2010 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=77951719991&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pap.0b013e3181d97635; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20418674; https://journals.lww.com/00125480-201005000-00005; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00125480-201005000-00005; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pap.0b013e3181d97635; https://journals.lww.com/anatomicpathology/Abstract/2010/05000/Pancreas_Transplant__Recent_Advances_and_Spectrum.5.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know