Circulating Plasma Epstein-Barr Virus DNA Load during the Follow-up Periods Predicts Recurrence and Metastasis in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Cancer Journal (United States), ISSN: 1540-336X, Vol: 28, Issue: 2, Page: 85-92
2022
- 7Citations
- 9Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations7
- Citation Indexes7
- CrossRef6
- Captures9
- Readers9
Article Description
Background Epstein-Barr virus DNA (EBV DNA) load has been identified as a prognostic factor in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), whereas the dynamic changes in the long period have not been explored. In this study, we evaluated EBV DNA kinetics and its role in the survival. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 900 NPC patients. Plasma EBV DNA levels were measured at various time points after treatment. The correlations of EBV kinetics with recurrence and metastasis were analyzed. After stratifying patients according to the EBV results, survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Twelve-and 24-month landmark analyses for overall survival (OS) data were performed according to the EBV groups. Results Patients with post-EBV of less than 2500 copies/mL achieved better survival than did those with higher ones. Furthermore, patients with continuously elevated EBV DNA expressed significantly poorer OS (hazard ratio [HR], 2.542, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.077-3.111; P < 0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (HR, 2.970; 95% CI, 2.392-3.687; P < 0.001), locoregional-free survival (HR, 1.699; 95% CI, 1.072-2.692; P = 0.013), and progression-free survival (HR, 2.535; 95% CI, 1.987-3.233; P < 0.001) than did patients with continuously normal EBV or those with elevated levels at any time point. The 5-year OS with elevated EBV was lower than that of the remission group by using the 12-and 24-month landmark analysis. Conclusions Elevated EBV DNA after treatment was a better predictive indicator of survival than the baseline concentrations. Furthermore, continuously elevated EBV DNA after treatment indicated recurrence, metastasis, and unfavorable prognosis for NPC. In addition, there were consistent patterns of EBV DNA kinetics during long-Term follow-up, which warrant further study.
Bibliographic Details
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know