The evolving role of blending of the lid-cheek junction in lower blepharoplasty
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, ISSN: 0032-1052, Vol: 142, Issue: 2, Page: 377-382
2018
- 15Citations
- 22Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations15
- Citation Indexes15
- 15
- CrossRef10
- Captures22
- Readers22
- 22
Article Description
Background: Lower blepharoplasty has evolved from traditional lower blepharoplasty involving skin-muscle flaps and fat resection to newer concepts that emphasize blending the lid-cheek junction. It is the objective of this review to evaluate these new concepts for their efficacy in blending the lid-cheek junction. Methods: A comprehensive review of literature was performed using PubMed/MEDLINE to identify studies evaluating fat conservation, fat augmentation, fat repositioning, orbicularis retaining ligament (ORL) release, septal reset, and use of fillers in deep cheek fat compartments to obtain aesthetically pleasing lid-cheek junction. Results: A total of 22 studies meeting inclusion criteria and evaluating fat conservation, fat augmentation, fat repositioning, ORL release, septal reset, and use of fillers in deep cheek fat compartments are analyzed and discussed. Conclusions: This review provides the current evidence for various strategies that can be used alone or combined to obtain youthful lid-cheek junction. It provides the current evidence-based scientific rationale for optimal management of the lower eyelid cheek area for facial rejuvenation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059496131&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000004593; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29787515; https://journals.lww.com/00006534-201808000-00017; http://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00006534-201808000-00017; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00006534-201808000-00017
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know