Warping Characteristics of Rib Allograft Cartilage
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, ISSN: 0032-1052, Vol: 146, Issue: 1, Page: 37E-42E
2020
- 19Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations19
- Citation Indexes19
- 19
- CrossRef1
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
Summary: When septal cartilage is lacking, commercially available costal cartilage allograft can be used. Such allografts have "off-the-shelf" accessibility, are available in multiple sizes, are aseptically processed to meet sterility, and are screened to minimize infectious risks. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of donor age, storage temperature, and orientation of a bilayered construct on the degree of warping of a commercialized fresh frozen costal cartilage allograft in vitro over time. A total of 140 fresh frozen costal cartilage cadaveric specimens were separated into three donor age groups. These were allocated into three harvesting subgroups: Group a, single pieces (cephalocaudal segments); group b, two laminated pieces of the same rib sutured together in anatomical position (laminated group); and group c, two pieces from the same rib reversed onto each other and sutured together (oppositional group). Photographs were examined and analyzed to determine the degree of cartilaginous warping. Decreased rates of warping were seen in commercially available, aseptically processed costal cartilage allografts procured from older cadavers. Warping was also decreased when oppositional suturing techniques were used as a way to address those intrinsic cartilage forces.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087321119&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006896; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32590648; https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006896; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000006896; https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Abstract/2020/07000/Warping_Characteristics_of_Rib_Allograft_Cartilage.16.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know