Analysis of the national surgical quality improvement program database in 19,100 patients undergoing implant-based breast reconstruction: complication rates with acellular dermal matrix
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, ISSN: 0032-1052, Vol: 132, Issue: 5, Page: 1057-1066
2013
- 70Citations
- 67Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations70
- Citation Indexes68
- 68
- CrossRef63
- Policy Citations2
- Policy Citation2
- Captures67
- Readers67
- 67
Article Description
BACKGROUND:: The use of acellular dermal matrices has become increasingly popular in immediate and delayed tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction. However, it is unclear whether their use is associated with increased postoperative complication rates. Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, the authors assessed baseline differences in demographics and comorbidities with and without acellular dermal matrix and determined whether postoperative complication rates varied. METHODS:: Using the national surgical database (2005 to 2011), tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction cases were extracted using Current Procedural Terminology codes. Differences in preoperative demographics and comorbidities were assessed using chi-square and t test analysis using SPSS. The authors analyzed variations in complication rates and determined whether demographics and comorbidities affected outcomes using multivariate logistical analysis. A post hoc power study was calculated. RESULTS:: Of 19,100 cases, 3301 involved acellular dermal matrix use. Overall complication rates were not statistically significant (acellular dermal matrix, 5.3 percent; non-acellular dermal matrix, 4.9 percent; p = 0.396). Several risk factors were statistically significant associated factors of complications. Higher body mass index was associated with wound complications in both cohorts. In the non-acellular dermal matrix group, body mass index, smoking, and diabetes were associated with major complications, and radiotherapy and steroid use with minor complications. CONCLUSIONS:: Acellular dermal matrix use did not appear to increase complication rates in tissue expander/implant-based breast reconstruction in this survey of a national surgical database. There was no significant difference in complication rates between the acellular dermal matrix and non-acellular dermal matrix groups.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84887293099&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182a3beec; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24165587; http://journals.lww.com/00006534-201311000-00004; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00006534-201311000-00004; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/prs.0b013e3182a3beec; https://insights.ovid.com/article/00006534-201311000-00004
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know