Preventing Dental Surgical Fires: Characterizing Nasal-Cannulated Supplemental Oxygen Pooling in an in Situ Dental Procedure
Journal of Patient Safety, ISSN: 1549-8425, Vol: 16, Issue: 4, Page: 316-319
2020
- 2Citations
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations2
- Citation Indexes2
- CrossRef1
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Article Description
Objectives Surgical operatory fires continue to occur in the United States, often with devastating consequences. Because more than 21% concentrations of oxygen are necessary for the onset of such combustion, this study examined fluctuations of surgical site oxygen levels. Better understanding how these more than 21% concentrations occur will not only add to surgical fire prevention efforts generally but also potentially reduce patient or staff harm and practitioner liability as well. Methods Performing an in situ dental procedure with supplemental nasal-cannulated oxygen and a dental dam, we measured oxygen pooling, defined as any fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO2) greater than the 21% FIO2 of air, on top of and behind a dental dam, and during the application of high-volume intraoral suction. Results Findings indicated statistically significantly higher concentrations (as much as twice the <30% recommended safe level) behind the dental dam compared with on top of it. During real-time measurements of FIO2 for four 120-second trials per participant, oxygen levels exhibited significant fluctuation above and below a more stringent 24.9% safety threshold established in prior research. Application of high-speed intraoral dental suction reduced FIO2 to near atmospheric levels in 30 (96.7%) of 31 of the cases by 60 seconds. Conclusions These results demonstrate the elevated risk associated with above-safe levels of oxygen pooling during a simple dental procedure. Although future research is needed to still more exactly characterize conditions leading to the onset of surgical fires, this study also demonstrates the ability of high-speed intraoral suction to dramatically and rapidly decrease that risk.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85096508691&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000677; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32217928; https://journals.lww.com/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000677; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/pts.0000000000000677; https://journals.lww.com/journalpatientsafety/Abstract/2020/12000/Preventing_Dental_Surgical_Fires__Characterizing.17.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know