Cleft patient-reported postoperative donor site pain following alveolar autologous iliac crest bone grafting: Comparing two minimally invasive harvesting techniques
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, ISSN: 1536-3732, Vol: 26, Issue: 7, Page: 2099-2103
2015
- 14Citations
- 77Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations14
- Citation Indexes14
- 14
- CrossRef11
- Captures77
- Readers77
- 69
Article Description
Background: Autologous bone grafting is still considered the standard method for alveolar cleft repair. However, donor site morbidities remain a relevant problem in cleft care. Thus, the authors assessed postoperative donor site pain in cleft patients who underwent alveolar cleft repair by iliac crest bone graft transferring through a prospective randomized study comparing 2 minimally invasive harvesting techniques. Methods: Fifty-six consecutive patients with cleft lip and palate who underwent iliac crest bone grafting for alveolar cleft repair were randomly divided into 2 groups: bone graft harvested by minimally invasive techniques without (group 1) and with (group 2) periosteum elevation. Postoperative donor site pain was evaluated using a unidimensional numerical pain intensity rating scale (0, ''no pain;'' 10, ''worst pain imaginable'') at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 hours after the procedures and on the 3rd, 7th, 14th, 21st, and 28th days after surgeries. Intergroup comparisons were performed. Results: The mean measurements of donor site pain revealed no significant differences (all P>0.05) in any of the evaluated postoperative period comparisons between groups 1 and 2. There was a greater number (P<0.05) of group 1 patients who reported ''no pain'' in the donor site compared with group 2, suggesting that periosteum elevation may play a role in pain intensity measurement. Conclusions: This prospective randomized study showed no difference in pain intensity among cleft patients who had postoperative pain. However, a greater number of patients in group 1 reported ''no pain'' in comparison to patients in group 2.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84945443067&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000002077; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26413958; https://journals.lww.com/00001665-201510000-00014; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00001665-201510000-00014; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000002077; https://insights.ovid.com/article/00001665-201510000-00014
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know