Radical surgery for head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma failed primary chemotherapy
Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, ISSN: 1536-3732, Vol: 30, Issue: 2, Page: E113-E116
2019
- 5Citations
- 17Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations5
- Citation Indexes5
- CrossRef4
- Captures17
- Readers17
- 17
Article Description
Objective: The aim of the study was to explore an optimal surgery way for head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma (HNRMS) children who have failed primary chemotherapy. Methods: A total of 51 HNRMS children who have failed primary chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed from April 2005 to May 2017. Surgery was performed in 2 ways, widely radical resection (22 patients) and conservative resection (29 patients). Multivariate analysis was performed to identify the various variables related to overall survival (OS). Results: The estimated 5-year OS was 53%. Embryonic RMS enjoyed a favorable outcome than those nonembryonic RMS (P=0.03). Head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma children who received partial remission (PR) after primary chemotherapy enjoyed a better outcome than those only achieved stable disease (SD) (P=0.006). A total of 22 children accepted widely radical resection, whereas 29 patients got conservative resection. Interestingly, the 2 groups did not have a statistical significance (P=0.86). However, the latter group children have conserved more important organs, such as eyeball, facial nerves, and enough mandible or maxilla bones, and have enjoyed a better life quality. Conclusion: Primary chemotherapy is most important for HNRMS children, which influences the prognosis of HNRMS widely. Conservative resection is an optimal surgery way for HNRMS, bringing a better life quality for these children.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85067292540&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000005019; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30550438; https://journals.lww.com/00001665-201903000-00088; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000005019; https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=00001665-201903000-00088
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know