A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database
Annals of Surgery, ISSN: 1528-1140, Vol: 260, Issue: 2, Page: 259-266
2014
- 481Citations
- 135Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations481
- Citation Indexes479
- 479
- CrossRef256
- Clinical Citations1
- PubMed Guidelines1
- Policy Citations1
- Policy Citation1
- Captures135
- Readers135
- 135
- Mentions1
- News Mentions1
- News1
Most Recent News
Study of Porcine Fibrin Sealant in Preventing Cervical Anastomotic Leakage for Esophageal or Junctional Carcinoma.; PLACE020
STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Porcine Fibrin Sealant in Preventing Cervical Anastomotic Leakage After Esophagectomy for Esophageal or Junctional Carcinoma: A Phase II,Single Arm,Prospective Study. CURRENT
Article Description
Objective: This study aimed to create a risk model of mortality associated with esophagectomy using a Japanese nationwide database. Methods: A total of 5354 patients who underwent esophagectomy in 713 hospitals in 2011 were evaluated. Variables and definitions were virtually identical to those adopted by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Results: The mean patient age was 65.9 years, and 84.3% patients were male. The overall morbidity ratewas 41.9%. Thirty-day and operative mortality rates after esophagectomywere 1.2% and 3.4%, respectively. Overall morbiditywas significantly higher in the minimally invasive esophagectomy group than in the open esophagectomy group (44.3% vs 40.8%, P = 0.016). The odds ratios for 30-day mortality in patients who required preoperative assistance in activities of daily living (ADL), those with a history of smoking within 1 year before surgery, and those with weight loss more than 10% within 6months before surgery were 4.2, 2.6, and 2.4, respectively. The odds ratios for operative mortality in patients who required preoperative assistance in ADL, those with metastasis/relapse, male patients, and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were 4.7, 4.5, 2.3, and 2.1, respectively. Conclusions: This study was the first, as per our knowledge, to perform risk stratification for esophagectomy using a Japanese nationwide database. The 30-day and operative mortality rates were relatively lower than those in previous reports. The risk models developed in this study may contribute toward improvements in quality control of procedures and creation of a novel scoring system. Copyright © 2014 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84905569828&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000644; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24743609; https://journals.lww.com/00000658-201408000-00012; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00000658-201408000-00012; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/sla.0000000000000644; https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Abstract/2014/08000/A_Risk_Model_for_Esophagectomy_Using_Data_of_5354.12.aspx
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know