PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation on Lymph Node Status in Esophageal Cancer: Post hoc Analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial

Annals of Surgery, ISSN: 1528-1140, Vol: 261, Issue: 5, Page: 902-908
2015
  • 70
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 56
    Captures
  • 1
    Mentions
  • 0
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

Most Recent News

Surgery With or Without Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Esophageal Cancer

STUDY INFORMATION OFFICIAL TITLE: Randomized Study of Pre-Operative Radio-Chemotherapy Versus Surgery Alone in Thoracic Esophageal Cancer Deemed to be Resectable CURRENT STATUS: Completed STUDY TYPE:

Article Description

Objective: The study objectives were to analyze the impact of the number of lymph nodes (LNs) reported as resected (NLNr) and the number of LNs invaded (NLNi) on the prognosis of esophageal cancer (EC) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Background: Pathological LN status is a major disease prognostic factor and marker of surgical quality. The impact of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) on LN status remains poorly studied in EC. Methods: Post hoc analysis from a phase III randomized controlled trial comparing nCRT and surgery (group nCRT) to surgery alone (group S) in stage I and II EC (NCT00047112). Only patients who underwent surgical resection were considered (n = 170). Results: nCRT resulted in tumoral downstaging (pT0, 40.7% vs 1.1%, P < 0.001), LN downstaging (pN0, 69.1% vs 47.2%, P = 0.016), and reduction in the median NLNr [16.0 (range, 0-47.0) vs 22.0 (range, 3.0-58.0), P = 0.001] and NLNi [0 (range, 0-25) vs 1.0 (range, 0-25), P = 0.001]. A good histological response (TRG1/2) in the resected esophageal specimen correlated with reduced median NLNi [0 (range, 0-10) vs 1.0 (range, 0-4), P = 0.007]. After adjustment by treatment, NLNi [hazards ratio (HR) (1-3 vs 0) 3.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-5.5, and HR (>3 vs 0) 3.5, 95% CI: 2.0-6.2, P < 0.001] correlated with prognosis, whereas NLNr [HR (<15 vs ≥15) 0.95, 95% CI: 0.6-1.4, P = 0.807 and HR (<23 vs ≥23) 1.4, 95% CI: 0.9-2.0, P = 0.131] did not. In Poisson regression analysis, nCRT was an independent predictive variable for reduced NLNr [exp(coefficient) 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66-0.96, P = 0.018]. Conclusions: nCRT is not only responsible for disease downstaging but also predicts fewer LNs being identified after surgical resection for EC. This has implications for the current quality criteria for surgical resection.

Bibliographic Details

Robb, William B; Dahan, Laetitia; Mornex, Françoise; Maillard, Emilie; Thomas, Pascal-Alexandre; Meunier, Bernard; Boige, Valérie; Pezet, Denis; Le Brun-Ly, Valérie; Bosset, Jean-François; Mabrut, Jean-Yves; Triboulet, Jean-Pierre; Bedenne, Laurent; Seitz, Jean-François; Mariette, Christophe; Fédération Française de Cancérologie Digestive, Société Française de Radiothérapie Oncologique, Union des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer, Groupe Coopérateur Multidisciplinaire en Oncologie, French EsoGAstric Tumour working group, Fédération de Recherche En Chirurgie

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Medicine

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know