Caffeine and progression of parkinson disease
Clinical Neuropharmacology, ISSN: 0362-5664, Vol: 31, Issue: 4, Page: 189-196
2008
- 37Citations
- 37Captures
Metric Options: Counts1 Year3 YearSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations37
- Citation Indexes37
- CrossRef37
- 37
- Captures37
- Readers37
- 37
Article Description
Objective: Caffeine use is negatively associated with the risk of developing Parkinson disease (PD) and is protective in animal models of PD, but the relationship between caffeine intake and rate of progression of PD is unknown. We assessed this relationship using data from 2 recent clinical trials of PD. Methods: Data were ascertained from 2 recent 1-year clinical trials that together included 413 early PD subjects who did not require symptomatic therapy at the time of study entry. Exploratory analyses compared caffeine intake with rate of progression of PD, as measured by either the likelihood of progression to the point of requiring symptomatic therapy or by change in the total Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale score. Results: Rate of progression of PD did not differ significantly between those in the highest and lowest quartiles for caffeine use for either of the primary measures or for secondary analyses of changes in scores on the motor or activities of daily living subsections of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale. Other secondary analyses yielded variable results. Conclusions: These data do not reveal a consistent relationship between caffeine intake and rate of progression of PD by these measures, although a larger study is required for sufficient power to more fully assess this relationship. © 2008 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=53449095363&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/wnf.0b013e31815a3f03; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18670242; http://content.wkhealth.com/linkback/openurl?sid=WKPTLP:landingpage&an=00002826-200807000-00001; https://journals.lww.com/00002826-200807000-00001; https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/wnf.0b013e31815a3f03; https://insights.ovid.com/ShowUpgradeBrowserMessage
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know