PlumX Metrics
Embed PlumX Metrics

Comparative experimental evidence on compliance with social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic

medRxiv
2020
  • 13
    Citations
  • 0
    Usage
  • 0
    Captures
  • 0
    Mentions
  • 2
    Social Media
Metric Options:   Counts1 Year3 Year

Metrics Details

  • Citations
    13
    • Citation Indexes
      12
      • CrossRef
        12
    • Policy Citations
      1
      • Policy Citation
        1
  • Social Media
    2
    • Shares, Likes & Comments
      2
      • Facebook
        2

Article Description

Social distancing is a central public health measure in the fight against the COVID-19 pandemic, but individuals’ compliance cannot be taken for granted. We use a survey experiment to examine the prevalence of non-compliance with social distancing in nine countries and test pre-registered hypotheses about individual-level characteristics associated with less social distancing. Leveraging a list experiment to control for social desirability bias, we find large cross-national variation in adherence to social distancing guidelines. Compliance varies systematically with COVID-19 fatalities and the strictness of lockdown measures. We also find substantial heterogeneity in the role of individual-level predictors. While there is an ideological gap in social distancing in the US and New Zealand, this is not the case in European countries. Taken together, our results suggest caution when trying to model pandemic health policies on other countries’ experiences. Behavioral interventions targeted towards specific demographics that work in one context might fail in another.

Bibliographic Details

Provide Feedback

Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know