Method development and characterization of the low molecular weight peptidome of human wound fluids
medRxiv
2020
- 1Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- CrossRef1
Article Description
Wound infections are significant challenges globally, and there is an unmet need for better diagnosis of wound healing status and infection. The wound healing process is characterized by proteolytic events that are the result of basic physiological processes involving coagulation and complement activation, but also dysfunctional activations by endogenous and bacterial proteases. Peptides, downstream reporters of these proteolytic actions, could therefore serve as a promising tool for diagnosis of wound healing and infection. In the present study, we demonstrate a method for the characterisation of the complete peptidome of human wound fluids. We compare acute non-infected wound fluids obtained post-surgery with plasma samples and find significantly higher protein and peptide numbers in wound fluids, which typically were also smaller in size as compared to plasma-derived peptides. Finally, we analyse wound fluids collected from dressings after facial skin graft surgery and compare three uninfected and normally healing surgical wounds with three inflamed and S. aureus infected wounds. The results identify unique peptide patterns of various selected proteins including coagulation and complement factors, as well as proteases and antiproteinases. Together, the work defines a workflow for analysis of peptides derived from human wound fluids and demonstrate a proof-of-concept that such wound fluids can be used for analysis of qualitative differences of peptide patterns derived from wound fluids on larger patient cohorts, providing novel biomarkers for wound healing and infection.
Bibliographic Details
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know